Triple junction solar cells tested at 107,000 feet.
[wp_youtube]sMI1LKs4FTM[/wp_youtube]
This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 10th, 2010 at 5:30 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
Did the platform track the sun, or was it just spinning about?
(I appologize for commenting on every posting; however I am very excited about your program and want to be open about that excitement)
We originally were going to track the sun, however we couldn’t verify the accuracy of the pointing in flight. We only wanted to do 2D tracking with the vertical angle preset so the cell would be pointed at the sun at time of peak altitude. This created a problem that small pitches in the platform would though off the data and it would be hard to tell in the data if we had a low performance in the cell or the tracker was just playing chase from the pitching. We could have really worked with the data afterwords, but I hate noisy data. By scanning the sun we can see in the data exactly when we’re pointing at the sun (we took data five times a second). We could extract just those point and start with a much cleaner data set.
I would have to dig out the numbers to get percentage of performance increase. I remember it was pretty impressive.
How was their performance?
Did the platform track the sun, or was it just spinning about?
(I appologize for commenting on every posting; however I am very excited about your program and want to be open about that excitement)
We originally were going to track the sun, however we couldn’t verify the accuracy of the pointing in flight. We only wanted to do 2D tracking with the vertical angle preset so the cell would be pointed at the sun at time of peak altitude. This created a problem that small pitches in the platform would though off the data and it would be hard to tell in the data if we had a low performance in the cell or the tracker was just playing chase from the pitching. We could have really worked with the data afterwords, but I hate noisy data. By scanning the sun we can see in the data exactly when we’re pointing at the sun (we took data five times a second). We could extract just those point and start with a much cleaner data set.
I would have to dig out the numbers to get percentage of performance increase. I remember it was pretty impressive.