<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Planning Session</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=94" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=94</link>
	<description>Our Journey to Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad Heisler</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=94#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad Heisler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/01/13/planning-session/#comment-77</guid>
		<description>I suppose the FLOC concept could benefit from launch from a Dark Sky Station.  Starting at 140,000 feet the drag would be only maybe 1% of that at sea level, so a larger number of ships could be coupled together without as much concern for the drag &quot;nightmare.&quot;  Fewer total ships and fewer nail biting exoatmospheric rendezvous.  Also, the first such exoatmospheric rendezvous would occur at least 140,000 feet higher, and so occur in a lower drag environment.  Perhaps more time could be allocated to each exoatmospheric rendezvous also.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the FLOC concept could benefit from launch from a Dark Sky Station.  Starting at 140,000 feet the drag would be only maybe 1% of that at sea level, so a larger number of ships could be coupled together without as much concern for the drag &#8220;nightmare.&#8221;  Fewer total ships and fewer nail biting exoatmospheric rendezvous.  Also, the first such exoatmospheric rendezvous would occur at least 140,000 feet higher, and so occur in a lower drag environment.  Perhaps more time could be allocated to each exoatmospheric rendezvous also.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Goff</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=94#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Goff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/01/13/planning-session/#comment-67</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t mean to be rude--most of that was tongue-in-cheek.  I&#039;ve just had enough people give me crap for posting anything that&#039;s even slightly unorthodox that I was trying to head off criticism.  I wanted it to be clear that while I thought the idea was clever, that I also didn&#039;t think it was the greatest idea since sliced bread, and the one and only True Way (TM) to get to space.  But I probably went overboard in those regards, in which case I apologize.

~Jon</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t mean to be rude&#8211;most of that was tongue-in-cheek.  I&#8217;ve just had enough people give me crap for posting anything that&#8217;s even slightly unorthodox that I was trying to head off criticism.  I wanted it to be clear that while I thought the idea was clever, that I also didn&#8217;t think it was the greatest idea since sliced bread, and the one and only True Way (TM) to get to space.  But I probably went overboard in those regards, in which case I apologize.</p>
<p>~Jon</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
