<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Our 100th Mission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=478" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478</link>
	<description>Our Journey to Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: William House</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478#comment-38217</link>
		<dc:creator>William House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/03/16/our-100th-mission/#comment-38217</guid>
		<description>Can you drop rockets instead of a launch platform?

I read where you lauch rockets vertically from a platform lifted by a balloon.

I wondered if it would be better to drop these rockets from a balloon so that they already have speed when the engine starts?

These dropped rockets could also have wings to help direct the rocket back to space - these wings could be dropped when not needed.

Just a thought.
Keep up the great work!

PS Another idea I&#039;ve had is an electromagnet sled to launch rockets, possibly up the side of a mountian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you drop rockets instead of a launch platform?</p>
<p>I read where you lauch rockets vertically from a platform lifted by a balloon.</p>
<p>I wondered if it would be better to drop these rockets from a balloon so that they already have speed when the engine starts?</p>
<p>These dropped rockets could also have wings to help direct the rocket back to space &#8211; these wings could be dropped when not needed.</p>
<p>Just a thought.<br />
Keep up the great work!</p>
<p>PS Another idea I&#8217;ve had is an electromagnet sled to launch rockets, possibly up the side of a mountian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478#comment-38170</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:10:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/03/16/our-100th-mission/#comment-38170</guid>
		<description>We need to get through the vehicle full up test before we can set the date. We&#039;re pushing pretty hard, I&#039;m just dying to fly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need to get through the vehicle full up test before we can set the date. We&#8217;re pushing pretty hard, I&#8217;m just dying to fly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478#comment-38166</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 17:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/03/16/our-100th-mission/#comment-38166</guid>
		<description>So when is the next flight scheduled for???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when is the next flight scheduled for???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478#comment-32445</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/03/16/our-100th-mission/#comment-32445</guid>
		<description>Thank you Anthony for your reply. Based on your reply I would venture to say that my questions may have been a little silly. So, At the current size of the missions helium is not a huge expense, but when mission are scaled up will it become more substantial? At the current scale is it 1 tank of helium per mission? Couldn&#039;t the tank be much smaller and made of carbon fiber with some kind of bladder to prevent leakage since it only has to bias the volume of oxygen displaced to manipulate bouency and not completly deflate the balloon? Helium I believe is a basically non renewable resource on the earth and therefore may become more expenssive in years to come as reserves are depleated. Can&#039;t wait for mission 100.Keep up the good work guys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Anthony for your reply. Based on your reply I would venture to say that my questions may have been a little silly. So, At the current size of the missions helium is not a huge expense, but when mission are scaled up will it become more substantial? At the current scale is it 1 tank of helium per mission? Couldn&#8217;t the tank be much smaller and made of carbon fiber with some kind of bladder to prevent leakage since it only has to bias the volume of oxygen displaced to manipulate bouency and not completly deflate the balloon? Helium I believe is a basically non renewable resource on the earth and therefore may become more expenssive in years to come as reserves are depleated. Can&#8217;t wait for mission 100.Keep up the good work guys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony Gregory</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478#comment-32103</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Gregory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/03/16/our-100th-mission/#comment-32103</guid>
		<description>I should leave this answer to our experts. But, the helium isn&#039;t a huge expense and since one tank to store the helium weighs 120 pounds and our entire launch platform needs to be under about 20 pounds the weight alone would not allow for a launch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should leave this answer to our experts. But, the helium isn&#8217;t a huge expense and since one tank to store the helium weighs 120 pounds and our entire launch platform needs to be under about 20 pounds the weight alone would not allow for a launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=478#comment-32012</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/03/16/our-100th-mission/#comment-32012</guid>
		<description>I have a couple questions. Do you lose your Helium every time you fly? Is it an expensive portion of your expenditures? Could you incorporate a small tank and pump to bleed helium back into, and bring the vehicle back to ground with out balloon pop? Forgive me if these questions are stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a couple questions. Do you lose your Helium every time you fly? Is it an expensive portion of your expenditures? Could you incorporate a small tank and pump to bleed helium back into, and bring the vehicle back to ground with out balloon pop? Forgive me if these questions are stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
