Comments on: Airbeam and Antenna Stand Work http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=441 Our Journey to Space Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:44:38 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Frisco Rose http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=441#comment-23430 Frisco Rose Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:07:18 +0000 http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/02/07/airbeam-and-antenna-stand-work/#comment-23430 Just in case you want to see the full size image of the endcap/bucket http://jpaerospace.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/endcap_bucket_test.jpg Just in case you want to see the full size image of the endcap/bucket

http://jpaerospace.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/endcap_bucket_test.jpg

]]> By: BalloonWhisperer http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=441#comment-23083 BalloonWhisperer Sat, 07 Feb 2009 05:25:30 +0000 http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2009/02/07/airbeam-and-antenna-stand-work/#comment-23083 Here's hoping for a good 4 psi or more. It's quite amazing to me that all we need is about 2 psi. Does that mean the rarefied air hitting the airship at mach 3 or 5 will not harm the wing that is being inflated at a mere 2 psi? Or, is this 2 psi the requirement for Ascender, a much slower vehicle, though it travels in denser air. Ah, the mysteries of upper atmospheric research... Here’s hoping for a good 4 psi or more. It’s quite amazing to me that all we need is about 2 psi. Does that mean the rarefied air hitting the airship at mach 3 or 5 will not harm the wing that is being inflated at a mere 2 psi? Or, is this 2 psi the requirement for Ascender, a much slower vehicle, though it travels in denser air. Ah, the mysteries of upper atmospheric research…

]]>