<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reaching for 2 psi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378</link>
	<description>Our Journey to Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378#comment-10780</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 14:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/12/03/reaching-for-2-psi/#comment-10780</guid>
		<description>If I could ask a question. If 50 pounds is your target weight and your suspending the weigh directly below the center of your arch. Would it make any sense to move to multiple inner cells? Iknow there would be a weight trade off,  but wouldn&#039;t multiple inner cells be:
1). Easier to buy/manufacture?
2). Redundent achitecture and therefore advantagous to surviving partcial failure?
3). Better at supporting weight than a single cell?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I could ask a question. If 50 pounds is your target weight and your suspending the weigh directly below the center of your arch. Would it make any sense to move to multiple inner cells? Iknow there would be a weight trade off,  but wouldn&#8217;t multiple inner cells be:<br />
1). Easier to buy/manufacture?<br />
2). Redundent achitecture and therefore advantagous to surviving partcial failure?<br />
3). Better at supporting weight than a single cell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378#comment-10684</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 08:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/12/03/reaching-for-2-psi/#comment-10684</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s wonderful when things take shape: good luck to you!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s wonderful when things take shape: good luck to you!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378#comment-10662</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:48:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/12/03/reaching-for-2-psi/#comment-10662</guid>
		<description>We&#039;re using a 2oz per yard outer shell and a thin film poly inner cell. The trick for a very ridged inflated structure is to have a no stretch outer shell and an over sized inner cell. 

This is just our test material. We want to get to a 0.4 oz per yard material.

JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re using a 2oz per yard outer shell and a thin film poly inner cell. The trick for a very ridged inflated structure is to have a no stretch outer shell and an over sized inner cell. </p>
<p>This is just our test material. We want to get to a 0.4 oz per yard material.</p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve G</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378#comment-10660</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 20:24:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/12/03/reaching-for-2-psi/#comment-10660</guid>
		<description>My inflatable canoe body is made of vinyl overlaid with nylon and is designed for 1.5 psi.   Are these materials to heavy for your air ribs?   I wish you the best of success in your float to space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My inflatable canoe body is made of vinyl overlaid with nylon and is designed for 1.5 psi.   Are these materials to heavy for your air ribs?   I wish you the best of success in your float to space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378#comment-10583</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 02:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/12/03/reaching-for-2-psi/#comment-10583</guid>
		<description>A balloon will pop around 0.2 psi. We made an airbeam arch that will support a 50 pound suspended load when it&#039;s at 2.0 psi.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A balloon will pop around 0.2 psi. We made an airbeam arch that will support a 50 pound suspended load when it&#8217;s at 2.0 psi.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AshleyZ</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=378#comment-10562</link>
		<dc:creator>AshleyZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/2008/12/03/reaching-for-2-psi/#comment-10562</guid>
		<description>How much is 2 psi in real terms?  If you put 2 psi into a plastic bag, would it pop?  How stiff would the rib be at that pressure?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How much is 2 psi in real terms?  If you put 2 psi into a plastic bag, would it pop?  How stiff would the rib be at that pressure?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
