<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Cold Mission</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=2483" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=2483</link>
	<description>Our Journey to Space</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2022 19:44:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=2483#comment-76717</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 18:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=2483#comment-76717</guid>
		<description>The new data is great but when they announce it like this it completely discredits themselves.
When ever a new expensive NASA satellite needs a boost they &quot;discover&quot; an already known phenomenon.

The upward gamma-ray bursts have been know for quite a while. How could it be a &quot;never-before-seen phenomenon&quot; when there are about 20 really good studies (by balloons) already published about it?  Heck, I even have a paragraph about it in my book that been out a couple years (there&#039;s even a cartoon).  NASA has a bit of a history of this. The classic goes all the way back to the their first satellite explorer one. It &quot;discover&quot; the Van Allen Radiation belts that had already been discover by Van Allen. They needed a win so the discovery was rediscovered. It&#039;s fun to check the dates on Van Allens studies about the belts. Many predate the explorer one flight. This doesn&#039;t diminish James Van Allen in any way. In fact I think it shows what a truly great scientist he was.  He make the discovery with his low cost, university student and budget rockoon space program. He didn&#039;t actually needed NASA. They very much needed him.

It&#039;s not the researchers fault. They are really getting some new and great data about TGF&#039;s. I just get irked when great balloon discoveries are ignored until an &quot;important&quot; satellite takes a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new data is great but when they announce it like this it completely discredits themselves.<br />
When ever a new expensive NASA satellite needs a boost they &#8220;discover&#8221; an already known phenomenon.</p>
<p>The upward gamma-ray bursts have been know for quite a while. How could it be a &#8220;never-before-seen phenomenon&#8221; when there are about 20 really good studies (by balloons) already published about it?  Heck, I even have a paragraph about it in my book that been out a couple years (there&#8217;s even a cartoon).  NASA has a bit of a history of this. The classic goes all the way back to the their first satellite explorer one. It &#8220;discover&#8221; the Van Allen Radiation belts that had already been discover by Van Allen. They needed a win so the discovery was rediscovered. It&#8217;s fun to check the dates on Van Allens studies about the belts. Many predate the explorer one flight. This doesn&#8217;t diminish James Van Allen in any way. In fact I think it shows what a truly great scientist he was.  He make the discovery with his low cost, university student and budget rockoon space program. He didn&#8217;t actually needed NASA. They very much needed him.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not the researchers fault. They are really getting some new and great data about TGF&#8217;s. I just get irked when great balloon discoveries are ignored until an &#8220;important&#8221; satellite takes a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Waddington</title>
		<link>http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=2483#comment-76708</link>
		<dc:creator>Trent Waddington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:18:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jpaerospace.com/blog/?p=2483#comment-76708</guid>
		<description>Hey JP.  What do you think of this discovery:

http://www.space.com/10602-antimatter-beams-thunderstorms-nasa.html

Kinda sounds like yet another failure of ignorosphere science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey JP.  What do you think of this discovery:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.space.com/10602-antimatter-beams-thunderstorms-nasa.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.space.com/10602-antimatter-beams-thunderstorms-nasa.html</a></p>
<p>Kinda sounds like yet another failure of ignorosphere science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
